Independent analysis of power, rights, and constitutional limits.
Contact: info@bywhatright.com
Founding question

Every exercise of power must answer one question: By what right?!

By What Right?! is a developing platform evaluating law, policy, courts, and public officials through a single standard: the protection of individual rights and the limits of legitimate power.

The Question

The premise behind the project

Principles

Foundations before commentary

Foundation

What is legitimate power?

A foundational essay defining the moral conditions under which force may be used by government at all.

Rights

Individual rights and rational agency

The case that rights protect the conditions required for thought, action, production, and independent judgment.

Limits

Retaliatory force versus coercive force

A governing distinction that separates legitimate law from political management and moral substitution.

Current Evaluations

News judged by standard, not by tribe

Featured Analysis

Executive action and the expansion of administrative discretion

A model article examining whether urgency, efficiency, or policy preference can justify bypassing constitutional restraint.

Current evaluation • Replace with live article
Legislative Review

Congressional proposals affecting speech, property, and due process

A rolling section for evaluating proposed laws according to the rights they protect, redefine, or erode.

Hill watch • Replace with weekly update

SCOTUS Corner

Cases, reasoning, and limits

Court Watch

How this section works

Each case summary should identify the issue, the constitutional question, the rights involved, and whether the Court’s reasoning protects or weakens legitimate limits.

Template article • Replace with first case review
Judicial Standard

A decision is not automatically sound because it is authoritative

Judicial opinions must still be judged. Courts may clarify limits, distort them, or rationalize their collapse.

Foundational judicial essay

Public Officials

Officeholders under review

Congress

Votes and statements

Track whether lawmakers defend limits consistently or revert to outcome-based political reasoning.

Executive

Office and overreach

Evaluate whether executive action remains bounded by legitimate authority or claims discretionary power without principle.

States

Governors, attorneys general, and legislatures

State power can violate rights no less than federal power. This section extends the standard beyond Washington.

Rights Scoreboard

Accountability by recurring criteria

Subject Rights Constitutional Limits Use of Force Overall
Sample Lawmaker A Mixed Fail Mixed Fail
Sample Justice B Pass Mixed Pass Mixed
Sample Governor C Fail Fail Fail Fail